The cybersecurity landscape is undergoing a broad transformation driven by artificial intelligence (AI). AI-enabled adversaries now operate with unprecedented speed and sophistication, executing automated reconnaissance, deploying novel attacks at scale, and exploiting vulnerabilities across the entire attack surface faster than ever before. This adversarial AI is democratizing cybercrime, lowering the barrier to entry, and enabling less-sophisticated actors to launch fast, successful attacks. The stark reality is that traditional manual security operations (SecOps) can no longer keep pace with the sheer volume and velocity of modern threats.
Beyond automating manual activities, the speed of AI-driven attack execution is quickly shrinking the window for reactive security strategies, precipitating a need to increase proactive, risk, and exposure management strategies within SecOps functions.
As cybersecurity teams attempt to scale and extend existing systems, the high cost of security data access and storage further creates artificial barriers to fighting back, forcing security architects to compromise the data needed to enable a more rapid, more comprehensive understanding and response to attacks. Tacked on AI-enabled capabilities further increase cost, as AI token operations add an entirely new cost vector.
Security teams have more data, more alerts, and fewer people than ever. That’s not new; it’s been the story for a decade. What has changed is that AI has reached the point where it can meaningfully help with the work, not just surface more information for humans to process.
The question isn’t whether AI belongs in SecOps; every serious buyer already assumes it does. The question is: What does a well-designed AI-powered security experience actually look like?
Change is needed. Cybersecurity program strategies must fight back with more integrated, machine-driven capabilities able to scale without compromising security outcomes and security program affordability.
While industry consensus supports the transition toward more autonomous SecOps, the journey requires careful navigation. Autonomy without appropriate oversight introduces significant risk, and organizations’ risk tolerance levels vary considerably. There is no universally accepted approach to SOC autonomy; instead, organizations need the flexibility to architect and customize their human-in-the-loop and human-on-the-loop strategies, determining where, when, why, and how to deploy fully autonomous versus human-assisted activities and responses. The solution lies in a continuum of autonomy options that enable organizations to establish the optimal balance of machine-human collaboration and an ability to adapt this balance as their capabilities and confidence mature over time.
The pace of AI advancement presents both tremendous opportunity and operational challenge. While breakthrough innovations are emerging at an accelerating rate, security teams risk entering a perpetual cycle of technology replacement if they prematurely adopt today’s AI solutions without architecting for tomorrow’s innovations. Lean security organizations cannot afford the disruption and resource drain of continuous rip-and-replace cycles to access the next generation of AI capabilities.
Traditional security platforms have successfully bundled and integrated multiple security solutions, simplifying operations while enhancing threat detection and response efficacy. However, these first-generation platforms were designed to support human-centric activities, workflows, and decision-making processes. As SecOps processes increasingly leverage agentic AI to operate and collaborate more autonomously, legacy platforms reveal critical gaps in their ability to execute, orchestrate, manage, customize, and scale the rapidly proliferating ecosystem of AI agents required for modern defense.
Furthermore, first-generation platforms operate on economic models that are rapidly becoming unaffordable as growing data and agentic operating infrastructure requirements render these models obsolete.
This White Paper presents a comprehensive blueprint for an agentic SecOps platform: a next-generation architecture that empowers security teams to harness current AI innovations while building a scalable, extensible foundation for the future. This platform approach enables organizations to precisely control their desired level of autonomy today and evolve it over time, while positioning their environment to seamlessly adopt emerging AI advancements as they materialize. By bridging the gap between today’s AI capabilities and tomorrow’s innovations, this new platform paradigm ensures security teams can defend at machine speed without sacrificing strategic flexibility or operational control.
The evolution from deterministic automation to AI represents a fundamental architectural shift in SecOps. Traditional security platforms (see Figure 1 on the following page) have relied on rule-based, deterministic functions—predefined workflows that execute predictable actions in response to known conditions. While effective within their design parameters, these systems lack the adaptive intelligence needed to address the dynamic, unpredictable nature of modern cyberthreats.

Source: Omdia

Autonomous IT and Security, with the support of the ServiceNow platform, is designed to help organizations reach a self-healing and self-defending state. The platform combines agentic AI, data from the underlying (IT or security) infrastructure, and workflow automation to proactively identify and resolve business-impacting issues. Adopting this platform can help organizations optimize operational efficiency while significantly minimizing human intervention. Autonomous IT and Security can apply agentic AI in specific instances across IT service management, operations, asset management, security, and strategic portfolio management.

Source: Omdia

Omdia validated the benefits that organizations can gain from using the ServiceNow AI Platform to enable Autonomous IT and Security. Using briefings and online demonstrations, we specifically focused on how ServiceNow helps organizations redirect human effort to focus on strategic business initiatives, enable proactive resilience against security threats and attacks, and build intelligent defenses for mitigating security and business risk.

Source: Omdia

Source: Omdia

Source: Omdia

Source: Omdia

Source: Omdia

Source: Omdia
Struggling with alert fatigue and false positives drowns SecOps teams in manually driven work. This leaves little time for closing security gaps and fortifying an organization’s security posture.
Omdia validated that ServiceNow Autonomous IT and Security can help increase the impact of work performed by SecOps in fighting against threats and attacks. By employing agentic AI, organizations can cut through the alert volume and focus on security issues that are identified to pose the largest (negative) business impact and the biggest risk. With Autonomous IT and Security, organizations can more effectively bolster the existing security perimeter, especially as AI agents start to proactively remediate security issues with little to no manual intervention.

Source: Omdia

Source: Omdia
Addressing security and compliance risk can be increasingly complex, as these areas can easily overlap, but the respective teams may not be completely aligned in their view of the problems to be addressed. As the amount of security and compliance issue data continually increases, correlating this data to locate where the largest organizational risks lie can be overwhelming and time-consuming. While these teams can improve their individual risk profiles, the chances to improve the organizational risk profile can be lost.
Omdia validated that ServiceNow’s Autonomous IT and Security can optimize an organization’s security and compliance risk profile simultaneously. With ServiceNow’s agentic AI, SecOps and risk management teams can acquire an integrated view of how security vulnerabilities and identified areas of non-compliance relate. By employing ServiceNow’s solution, organizations can learn the higher-priority areas of risk and related vulnerabilities to resolve, subsequently building the required defenses to prevent these issues from reoccurring.
Copyright notice and disclaimer
The Omdia research, data, and information referenced herein (the “Omdia Materials”) are the copyrighted property of TechTarget, Inc. and its subsidiaries or affiliates (together “Informa TechTarget”) or its third-party data providers and represent data, research, opinions, or viewpoints published by Informa TechTarget and are not representations of fact.
The Omdia Materials reflect information and opinions from the original publication date and not from the date of this document. The information and opinions expressed in the Omdia Materials are subject to change without notice, and Informa TechTarget does not have any duty or responsibility to update the Omdia Materials or this publication as a result.
Omdia Materials are delivered on an “as-is” and “as-available” basis. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of the information, opinions, and conclusions contained in Omdia Materials.
To the maximum extent permitted by law, Informa TechTarget and its affiliates, officers, directors, employees, agents, and third-party data providers disclaim any liability (including, without limitation, any liability arising from fault or negligence) as to the accuracy or completeness or use of the Omdia Materials. Informa TechTarget will not, under any circumstance whatsoever, be liable for any trading, investment, commercial, or other decisions based on or made in reliance of the Omdia Materials.

Source: Omdia
© {{CurrentYear}} TechTarget, Inc. d/b/a Informa TechTarget. All rights reserved. The Informa TechTarget name and logo are subject to license. All other logos are trademarks of their respective owners. Informa TechTarget reserves the right to make changes in specifications and other information contained in this document without prior notice.